Photo: Holly This week marks the half after the local elections. In January, conagra annual report

The current loophole is a series of other failures that can explode in the next election campaign. conagra annual report Despite the fact that politicians are well known, the correction law drafting next year's campaign has not yet started.
Photo: Holly This week marks the half after the local elections. In January, conagra annual report the Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau will announce a declaration of party test results. After 6 months, start a new pre-election campaign, after 10 months will be the next parliamentary elections. What might look like next election campaign? If unchanged in the current legislation remains in force, then the only thing that can be said with certainty: it will be expensive. Just lots of ads will be legally allowed to spend around 570 thousand lats. Local government election campaign trends show that the next batch of legal costs will also be illegal: for instance, a much wider range of media content purchase. Quite reliable even openly conagra annual report violated the law - both parties, both from the media and the so-called "third-party" part - because of a statutory penalty is disproportionate to the benefits which can be gained from ignoring the law. All of these problems can be solved. For this purpose, no longer need to launch a new framework law, but it would suffice to relatively minor adjustments. But the disastrous lack of political conagra annual report will to make these changes. conagra annual report Parliamentary Public Administration and Local Government Committee, which is responsible for the regulation of election campaign, has several times promised to review the current framework, but until now nothing concrete has been made. Deflation party spending? One of the sectors conagra annual report where the Latvian economic decline has been especially remarkable conagra annual report is the advertising market. The media is now ready to sell advertising at substantially lower prices than a few years ago. At the same time lots of legal way to obtain funding for election campaigns has become sarežģītāk- citizens simply are not free money, which could donate, even if in return they get some illicit benefits. And given that the Latvian Party continues to be financed from the state budget, lots of opportunity to attract several hundreds conagra annual report of thousands conagra annual report of pounds in a fair way, without assuming korumpējošus conditions, conagra annual report has become almost of utopia. In such circumstances, conagra annual report the parties authorized as high spending "ceiling" conagra annual report is destructive. Currently, they are several conagra annual report times higher than in 2006 due to only one argument: the intervening rapidly increased political conagra annual report advertising rates. Online advertising prices have fallen - parties can purchase a large amount of advertising a lower price. However, the high spending "caps" they pressed to find any options permitted by law to collect funding, otherwise competing parties to the "push" with his campaign arrays. Statutory spending "ceiling" amount is tied to the average wage changes in Latvian. Unfortunately, in 2010 on the basis of the parties authorized the spending amounts will be considered the same "fatty" - 2008 - the average wage level, which explains why the campaign next year will be more expensive than this year. It would be only logical, subject to change conagra annual report in the Latvian economy, conagra annual report a review of the parties authorized spending amount. Otherwise, we come to where we were before: conagra annual report the parties are allowed to place a huge amount of advertising that they are expensive, but the public conagra annual report - even more expensive. High spending limit has not only a lot of problem. The 'price' of the lot is paid for donations received to finance advertising, eventually settled in the whole company. This price is unprofessional lot of puppets ("cashiers") state and national positions in companies whose main mission is either part of their income in a legal manner, or to donate to the party while in office, look for the option "schemes" as an indirect way to supplement the party treasury. The Company also paid to the fact that such a system provides a "natural" advantages for those parties that are particularly indiscriminate against their funding sources and working methods - they are always in Latvian conditions will attract more funding than the lot, which is something more or less honest business principles. It is safe to say that the system reproduces itself conagra annual report by continuing to operate fewer, Latvian conditions, very rich and not very honest people's interest. Regulatory loophole depth, apart from spending the amount of authorized parties, the current loophole is a series of other failures that can explode conagra annual report in the next election campaign. Historical parallels are not far to seek: for example, some "third party" advertising business pilotējumi 2005 election turned on a large scale positive campaigning in 2006. Only thanks to this campaign bravura performers and audacity, they noticed that from a legal point of view, the difference between the first hidden pilotējumiem and ignorant public organizations in the headline to channel extra money in the campaign. The absence of such bravura, CPCB probably never would also be a link between the parties and the civil society organizations noticing, and now they do not have to litigate hundreds of thousands and even millions of large overhead. Saeima, in mid-2008 and